Michael Burry Calls Tesla 'Ridiculously Overvalued' Amid Rising Competition
Tesla's valuation trades at over 250 times earnings, a rare multiple that has drawn renewed criticism from famed investor Michael Burry. In a recent Substack post, Burry labeled the electric vehicle giant "ridiculously overvalued" and warned that Elon Musk's $1 trillion pay package would further dilute shareholder value.
Despite Tesla's US market share slipping to 41% as rivals roll out electric models, investors cheered the rollout of the company's robotaxi program and shares rose 11% in 2025.
But the real story is the leverage behind Burry's call—he identifies a shifting constraint from first-mover dominance to sustainable competitive advantage in the face of intensifying autonomous driving and robotics competition.
"The Elon cult was all-in on electric cars until competition showed up," Burry wrote, highlighting how Tesla's moat is eroding as rivals like Waymo and Chinese Unitree Robotics gain steam. True leverage lies in systems that work beyond hype cycles.
Why Tesla’s Valuation Ignores Competition as a Binding Constraint
Conventional wisdom credits Tesla’s sky-high valuation to its innovative edge and visionary leadership. But this ignores a critical leverage constraint: market dilution and competitive encroachment.
Unlike incremental tech advantages that compound, cultural hype and pay-package incentives inflate valuations without structural guardrails. Burry calls out the $1 trillion Musk package, tied to nearly doubling market cap (rom $4T to $8.5T), as a dilution mechanism relying on perpetual growth assumptions rather than operational leverage.
This mirrors constraints exposed in recent tech selloffs, where valuation multiples disconnected from sustainable moats collapse once competition aligns.
Competition Shifts the Leverage Curve in EVs and Robotics
Tesla’s ~$530 million short bet in 2021 and Burry’s 2025 critique spotlight how competition repositions constraints. While Tesla once leveraged first-mover advantage to compress costs and scale, rivals now target autonomous driving systems and robotics platforms as core levers.
Waymo’s backing from Google plugs into vast data and AI infrastructure, creating a leverage moat based on system-level integration rather than hype. Similarly, Unitree Robotics embodies a low-cost hardware lever that's hard for Tesla to replicate quickly.
Tesla’s expanding competition pool means margin compression, slowed market share gain, and higher market cap volatility—contrasting sharply with the myth that innovation alone secures infinite growth.
This dynamic is akin to what Tesla’s new safety report revealed: true leverage in autonomy comes from robust, scalable systems, not singular technology breakthroughs.
Who Gains When Competition Binds Tesla’s Leverage?
The binding constraint has shifted from being the first in electric vehicles to who can scale autonomous and robotic systems resiliently. Investors and operators who watch system durability over hype gain a strategic advantage.
Michael Burry’s pivot to public bets and commentary signals a broader awareness that leverage in 2025 means owning platforms that generate predictable user- and data-driven compounding benefits. Tesla’s dilution-based growth narrative stands increasingly isolated.
Like the AI bubble skepticism Burry voiced on Nvidia, Tesla’s valuation reflects optimism tied to hope, not constraint-shifted reality.
"Sustainable leverage requires competitive moats, not just market cap bets." Expect the next decade to reward companies mastering system resilience over Elon Musk’s bold growth targets.
Related Tools & Resources
As the competition intensifies in the electric vehicle space, understanding your market positioning becomes crucial. This is exactly why platforms like Hyros are essential for performance marketers and businesses alike, providing advanced ad tracking and attribution tools that help measure the return on investment effectively amid market fluctuations. Learn more about Hyros →
Full Transparency: Some links in this article are affiliate partnerships. If you find value in the tools we recommend and decide to try them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend tools that align with the strategic thinking we share here. Think of it as supporting independent business analysis while discovering leverage in your own operations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Tesla considered overvalued according to Michael Burry?
Michael Burry labels Tesla "ridiculously overvalued" partly because its valuation trades at over 250 times earnings, and he criticizes Elon Musk's $1 trillion pay package as dilutive to shareholder value.
How is Tesla's market share changing in the US electric vehicle market?
Tesla's US market share has slipped to 41% as more rivals roll out electric vehicle models, signaling increased competition.
What competitive pressures are impacting Tesla's leverage in 2025?
Competition in autonomous driving and robotics from companies like Waymo and Unitree Robotics pressures Tesla's leverage by shifting the advantage from first-mover status to sustainable competitive systems.
What role does Elon Musk's pay package play in Tesla's valuation concerns?
Elon Musk's $1 trillion pay package is tied to doubling Tesla's market cap from $4 trillion to $8.5 trillion, seen as a dilution mechanism inflating valuation without structural operational leverage.
How does Waymo create a competitive advantage over Tesla?
Waymo leverages Google's vast data and AI infrastructure to build a competitive moat based on system-level integration rather than hype-based valuation.
Why is sustainable leverage important in autonomous and robotic systems?
Sustainable leverage comes from building robust, scalable systems that operate beyond hype cycles, as shown by Tesla's shift away from relying only on technology breakthroughs.
What can investors learn from Michael Burry's perspective on Tesla?
Investors recognizing the importance of owning platforms with predictable, user- and data-driven compounding benefits gain strategic advantage over hype-driven growth narratives.
How can market dilution affect a high-tech company's valuation?
Market dilution from incentives and pay packages can inflate valuations without real operational growth, leading to inflated multiples that collapse once competition intensifies.