Why Zillow’s Climate Data Pull Reveals Realtor Control Over Homebuyers
Homebuyers on Zillow once saw precise scores measuring flood, wildfire, and storm risks from First Street, a nonprofit using peer-reviewed climate models. This year, Zillow removed those scores after pressure from CRMLS, a major real estate listing service supplying data to Zillow and others. But this isn’t only about data—this move exposes how real estate MLS groups control information flow to ease sales, often at the expense of buyers. "When you add friction to information, it simply gets used less," says First Street CEO Matthew Eby.
Why Transparency Is the First Casualty of Market Tightening
Conventional wisdom suggests real estate data platforms compete to provide the most useful information to consumers. In reality, dominant MLS services like CRMLS hold structural power over listings. By controlling data access, they constrain what sites like Zillow can show, prioritizing ease of sale over risk transparency. This dynamic reveals a classic constraint repositioning, where sellers reduce friction not by innovating but by limiting potentially sale-impeding information. This follows a similar principle to how some tech layoffs reflect structural leverage failures, not just cost cutting—see our analysis of 2024 Tech Layoffs.
Data Suppression: A Lever MLS Groups Pull to Protect Sellers
Zillow initially introduced First Street’s climate risk scores in 2024, joining Realtor.com and Redfin that had offered similar data since 2020. Unlike federal flood maps, First Street’s models provide granular, forward-looking flood and fire risk validated by real-world outcomes, accurately flagging high-risk homes in California wildfires. Yet, after CRMLS challenged flood risk predictions—even when recent events confirmed their validity—it forced Zillow to hide those scores. Unlike Redfin, which continues the data with some seller opt-out, Zillow now only links to First Street’s site indirectly.
This mechanism changes the leverage in real estate data by adding friction to climate risk visibility. It drops engagement from millions who casually scan listings into a smaller subset willing to dig deeper manually. In contrast, firms like OpenAI create leverage by seamlessly integrating data into user workflows—not by restricting access, illustrating a missed automation leverage gap in real estate platforms—see OpenAI’s ChatGPT Scale Play.
Leveraging Constraints to Shift Risk Awareness Away from Sellers
This situation crystallizes a fundamental leverage pattern: controlling data infrastructure channels information and shifts incentives. The constraint here is the MLS database gatekeeping. By demanding removal of predictive risk scores, MLS groups reduce buyer awareness of long-term risks to properties, effectively smoothing sales velocity amid a tightening market. Comparatively, Realtor.com seeks balance by encouraging local professional guidance, evidencing an infrastructure design choice that seeks to maintain both transparency and sales flow.
Contrast this with sectors like financial services where transparency is systemic, driven by regulatory mandates and open data platforms, which creates compounding trust advantages for firms embracing it. Real estate’s current dynamic signals that unlocking systemic leverage will require rethinking MLS data governance and buyer empowerment technologies—see our look at process documentation as a catalyst for systemic change.
The Hidden Cost and What Operators Must Watch Next
The immediate constraint shift is clear: access to actionable climate risk data at the point of sale is throttled by MLS control rather than technology limits. Sellers benefit by not scaring buyers with granular climate risks. Buyers lose decision-making leverage, facing higher insurance costs and catastrophic risk without upfront warning. Operators building real estate platforms should watch where MLS power consolidates next and how data friction layers grow.
Companies able to integrate risk data transparently at scale, while navigating MLS demands, will unlock untapped leverage in consumer trust and market positioning. Regions facing climate volatility like California and North Carolina exemplify critical markets where this leverage will either be won or lost. "Buyers deserve climate transparency at their fingertips, or leverage shifts irreversibly to sellers," as First Street’s CEO warns.
Related Tools & Resources
As the real estate market navigates data transparency challenges, leveraging technology to enhance security and oversight is essential. This is where tools like Surecam come into play, providing property owners and realtors with video surveillance solutions that contribute to safer and more trustworthy transactions. Learn more about Surecam →
Full Transparency: Some links in this article are affiliate partnerships. If you find value in the tools we recommend and decide to try them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend tools that align with the strategic thinking we share here. Think of it as supporting independent business analysis while discovering leverage in your own operations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Zillow remove climate risk scores from its listings in 2024?
Zillow removed the precise flood, wildfire, and storm risk scores provided by First Street after pressure from CRMLS, a major real estate listing service supplier, to limit this information accessible to homebuyers.
What role do MLS groups like CRMLS play in controlling real estate data?
MLS groups such as CRMLS hold structural power over listing data and control what information platforms like Zillow can show, often restricting risk data to prioritize ease of sales over buyer transparency.
How do First Street’s climate risk scores differ from federal flood maps?
First Street's climate risk scores use peer-reviewed, forward-looking models validated by real-world outcomes to provide granular predictions of flood and wildfire risks, unlike static federal flood maps.
Which real estate platforms currently provide climate risk data to homebuyers?
As of 2024, Realtor.com and Redfin continue to display climate risk data, with Redfin offering some seller opt-out options. Zillow removed direct scores but links indirectly to First Street’s site.
What impact does removing climate risk data have on homebuyers?
Removing direct climate risk scores reduces buyer awareness of property risks, potentially leading to higher insurance costs and unforeseen hazards, as buyers receive less upfront information.
How does Zillow’s removal of climate data compare with OpenAI’s data integration strategy?
Zillow’s removal adds friction by restricting access to critical data; in contrast, OpenAI creates leverage by seamlessly integrating data into user workflows, exemplifying better automation leverage.
What broader market dynamics does this Zillow-CRMLS conflict reveal?
The conflict highlights a leverage pattern where MLS gatekeeping limits transparency to smooth sales velocity, showing structural market power shaping information flow amid tightening real estate markets.
What should real estate platform operators watch moving forward?
Operators should monitor where MLS power consolidates next and how data friction evolves, as transparent integration of climate risk data could unlock consumer trust and new market positioning advantages.